In re Armstrong
United States Circuit Court
Application by Receiver for instructions. This is an application by David Armstrong, receiver of tito Fidelity National Bank, for instructions as to his action in regard to $2,000 received in payment of a certain note.
1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.
The petition of the receiver sets out the following state of facts, on which the instructions of the court are asked, viz.: On the eighteenth day of May, 1887, the Winters National Bank of Dayton, Ohio, being the holder and owner of a certain note for $2,000 made by L. FI. Lee & Bro., of Baltimore, Maryland, dated March 17, 1887, payable three (3) months after date at the Third National Bank of Baltimore, to the order of Whitely, Fassler & Kelley, and by them indorsed to said Winters National Bank, forwarded the same to the Fidelity National Bank of Cincinnati for collection and credit,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- White v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- First National Bank v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Bury v. WoodsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885