Legal Opinion

Hook v. Hook

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 2010No. WD-09-059PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Handwork, Judge.

{¶ 1} This appeal is from the judgment of the Wood County Court of Common Pleas, which found that shares of gifted stock and all the traceable assets purchased with the liquidated shares were nonmarital property. Upon consideration of the assignment of error, we affirm the decision of the lower court. Appellant, Darrin Hook, asserts the following single assignment of error on appeal:

{¶ 2} “The trial court committed prejudicial error by concluding, contrary to settled law and all competent evidence, that all shares of Pax Machine Works, Inc. were Plaintiff-Appellee’s separate…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holcomb v. HolcombOhio Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flynn v. FlynnOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. KrausOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Katherine Cassell v. William CassellMississippi Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Roth Produce Co. v. Ohio Department of Administrative Services, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division2010
  5. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API