Hook v. Hook
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Handwork, Judge.
{¶ 1} This appeal is from the judgment of the Wood County Court of Common Pleas, which found that shares of gifted stock and all the traceable assets purchased with the liquidated shares were nonmarital property. Upon consideration of the assignment of error, we affirm the decision of the lower court. Appellant, Darrin Hook, asserts the following single assignment of error on appeal:
{¶ 2} “The trial court committed prejudicial error by concluding, contrary to settled law and all competent evidence, that all shares of Pax Machine Works, Inc. were Plaintiff-Appellee’s separate…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Holcomb v. HolcombOhio Supreme Court · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- Flynn v. FlynnOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. KrausOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Katherine Cassell v. William CassellMississippi Supreme Court · 2024
- Roth Produce Co. v. Ohio Department of Administrative Services, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division2010
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 2019