Legal Opinion
Murchison v. District of Columbia Department of Public Works
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 2002No. 00-CV-200PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
The Office of Employee Appeals (OEA) reversed a decision of the District of Columbia Department of Public Works terminating Bonnie Murchison’s employment because of her unexcused absences from work. The Department appealed to the Superior Court, which reversed the OEA and reinstated Murchison’s termination. Murchison appeals that decision to this court. We reverse and remand for further factual findings by the OEA.
I
Murchison was employed by the Department of Public Works as a clerical assistant. The Department decided to remove her from its service because she was absent from work without…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stokes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Jimenez v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sinobia Newell-Brinkley v. Diana Haines WaltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Burton v. Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- 1303 Clifton Street, LLC v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Dupree v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Darryl Love and Alphonso Bryant v. District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals and District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.