Legal Opinion

Moskowitz v. Hornberger

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from judgment of the General Term of the City Court overruling the defendant’s exceptions and directing judgment on verdict in favor of the plaintiffs.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The plaintiffs sued to recover brokerage for effecting an exchange of the defendant’s property, known as No. 62 Seventh street, for premises known as Nos. 339, 341, 343, 345 and 347 East Twelfth street, in this. city. The plaintiffs allege an employment by the defendant to act for him as brokers, and a promise to pay them $400 as compensation in case they succeeded, and that acting thereunder they did succeed in effecting the exchange.

The plaintiffs proved that they effected the exchange, so far at least that through their efforts a valid contract was entered into by competent persons to make…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Trustees of Amherst College v. RitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Jones v. HabershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Kalley v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Myers v. CohnNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  5. Cambrelleng v. . PurtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pond v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Clemmons v. BrinnAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901
  3. Hann v. BrettlerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API