INFINITY REAL ESTATE, LLC v. TRAVELERS EXCESS AND SURPLUS LINES COMPANY
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INFINITY REAL ESTATE, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-6398 TRAVELERS EXCESS AND SURPLUS LINES COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Rufe, J. September 13, 2021 Plaintiff Infinity Real Estate has brought this action alleging that it was wrongfully denied insurance coverage for COVID-19 related losses. Defendant Travelers Excess and Surplus Lines Company has moved to dismiss. For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s motion will be granted. I. BACKGROUND1 Plaintiff, through a number of limited…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold PinkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Glassman v. Computervision Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.