Legal Opinion

Forbes v. Herr

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County

Decided January 16, 1926No. 33Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hassler, J.,

At the trial of this case the facts were agreed upon and submitted to the jury, who, under our instruction, found a verdict for plaintiff. We refused a point submitted by the defendants for binding instructions in their favor, and are now asked to enter judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto. The action is replevin, issued by the plaintiff to obtain possession of goods and chattels in the possession of the defendants by virtue of a landlord’s warrant. The right to levy upon the goods and chattels in question under the landlord’s warrant is denied by the plaintiff.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hessel v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Helser & McGrath v. Pott & ShreinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846
  3. Hessel v. Johnson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API