Legal Opinion

French v. Seely

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 1837PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR to the common pleas of Bradford county. George W. French against William Seely. Ejectment for four hundred acres of land.

Read the full summary

ERROR to the common pleas of Bradford county. George W. French against William Seely. Ejectment for four hundred acres of land. The plaintiff gave in evidence an application of George W. French, dated the 1st of November 1833, with the necessary affidavit of an improvement having been made and grain raised in 1807. On the 23d of July 1835 warrant to George W. French; survey the 14th of September 1835, and patent the 30th of October 1835. The defendant offered in evidence the application of William Seely for the land on the 30th of July 1831, when a warrant was granted; interest from the 1st…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Rogers, J.

The only question submitted to the decision o'f the court is the conclusive nature of the decree of the board of property. In answer to the defendant’s title, which was% founded on an actual settlement, warrant and survey of the 30th of July 1831, the plaintiff gave in evidence a caveat against issuing a patent to the defendant, Seefy, a decision in favour of the caveators, under whom the plaintiff claims, and then requested the court to charge the jury, that the decision of the board of property, and his neglecting to bring an action of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shoenburger v. BechtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. MatternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  2. Ege v. SidleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API