Legal Opinion

Ward v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 18, 1937No. 11816PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hutcheson, Justice.

1. It is only where the evidence is entirely circumstantial that the court is required, without request, to charge the jury on the law of circumstantial evidence. Brannon v. State, 140 Ga. 787 (7) (80 S. E. 7). There being direct evidence in the present case on all the essential elements of the crime charged, the failure of the court to charge the jury on the law of circumstantial evidence does not furnish cause for the grant of a new trial. Wilson v. State, 152 Ga. 337 (110 S. E. 8); Long v. State, 175 Ga. 274 (165 S. E. 75); Harris v. State, 178 Ga. 746 (174 S. E. 240).

2.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  2. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Brannon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Geer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Jester v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Claybourn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  5. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API