Legal Opinion

M.J.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 25, 1993No. 92-01622PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, Judge.

The appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. He argues that the evidence was obtained during an illegal search and seizure. We agree and reverse.

The testimony at the suppression hearing reveals that Officer Michael Samms of the Lakeland Police Department approached *1081the appellant, who was standing on the porch of a house under surveillance for drug activity. The appellant was startled by the officer’s appearance and attempted to conceal something in his mouth. The officer put his hand on the appellant’s shoulder and told the appellant that if he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Doney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. D.G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. A.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. State v. JamesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. Welch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API