Murphy v. Sigalos
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonald S. Taylor, J.
The parties are owners of properties which abut Church Street in the village of Hoosick Falls, New York. The northerly boundary line of plaintiff’s property runs westerly from Church Street a distance of 107 feet and is contiguous for its entire length to the defendant’s southerly boundary line. There is no dispute about the fact that when plaintiff purchased her property in 1904 she also acquired as §n appurtenance to it a right of way of passage about eight *634feet in width over the southerly strip of defendant’s premises which adjoined her northerly boundary line. The plaintiff sues in equity…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Belotti v. . BickhardtNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Di Leo v. Pecksto Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Snell v. . LevittNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Scallon v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Hindley v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reiter v. Landon Homes, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1968
- Rivlin v. SigalosNew York Supreme Court · 1957