Pure Wafer Inc. v. City of Prescott
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge N.R. SMITH
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether the City of Prescott, Arizona violated the Contract *946Clause of the Constitution when it declared that its sewage treatment plant would no longer accept wastewater discharged by one of its customers, a large metal refinishing plant.
I
This dispute sees the City of Prescott at odds with Pure Wafer, Inc., a corporate resident of Prescott, over contract interpretation. Pure Wafer’s grievances run from the constitutional — the City has violated our nation’s fundamental charter — to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- McCracken v. HaywardSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- W. B. Worthen Co. v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- State v. ToweryArizona Supreme Court · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pure Wafer Inc. v. City of PrescottDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- Ll Liquor, Inc. v. State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Abbott v. City of BellevueNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
- Alexander v. The Croix Townhomes LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
- Ambrosio v. Progressive Preferred Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.