Legal Opinion

Pure Wafer Inc. v. City of Prescott

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 10, 2017No. 14-15940PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge N.R. SMITH

OPINION

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether the City of Prescott, Arizona violated the Contract *946Clause of the Constitution when it declared that its sewage treatment plant would no longer accept wastewater discharged by one of its customers, a large metal refinishing plant.

I

This dispute sees the City of Prescott at odds with Pure Wafer, Inc., a corporate resident of Prescott, over contract interpretation. Pure Wafer’s grievances run from the constitutional — the City has violated our nation’s fundamental charter — to the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. McCracken v. HaywardSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  4. W. B. Worthen Co. v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. State v. ToweryArizona Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pure Wafer Inc. v. City of PrescottDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
  2. Ll Liquor, Inc. v. State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Abbott v. City of BellevueNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Alexander v. The Croix Townhomes LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
  5. Ambrosio v. Progressive Preferred Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API