Legal Opinion

Bell v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 2, 1960No. 547-56PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, Chief Judge

The plaintiffs sue for pay and allowances which they claim to be due them as prisoners of war from the dates of capture in 1950 and 1951 until their discharge from the Army on January 23, 1954.

They had enlisted in the United States Army at different dates in 1949. At the time of their capture they were privates, first class.

The applicable statutes are set out in the footnote.1 The *250plaintiffs claim that from the date of their capture until their actual discharge they were entitled under the statutes to the regular pay and allowances of soldiers of their classification.

*251The defendant alleges in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Heydenfeldt v. Daney Gold and Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Moreno v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  5. Luna v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Wilfong v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  3. Webb v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API