Legal Opinion
Wing v. Geico Insurance Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 2001No. S-9154PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Ursula Wing appeals an arbitration award she received against her insurer for damages she suffered from an accident caused by an uninsured motorist. She contends that the arbitration panel exceeded its authority in reducing its preliminary award, in failing to award attorney's fees to her, and in awarding expert fees against her. Because the arbitration panel did not exceed its authority, we affirm the panel's decision. 1
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Ursula Wing was injured by an uninsured motorist who rear-ended her car in August 1994. She suffered both…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alaska State Housing Authoarity v. Riley Pleas, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Ahtna, Inc. v. Ebasco Constructors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Falconer v. AdamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Masden v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by8 opinions
- McDonnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SchatkenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
- Sidney v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. LestenkofAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- McCarter v. McCarterAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.