Legal Opinion
Moloney v. Centner
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 27, 1989No. 88 C 6564PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
The plaintiffs Earle Moloney and Moloney Manufacturing Corp. filed this multicount action charging the defendants James Centner and Moloney Coachbuilders, Inc. with violations of § 43 of the Lanham Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125, the Illinois Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Ul.Rev. Stat. eh. 121V2, § 311 et seq., the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. I2IV2, ¶ 261 et seq. and various common law duties. The defendants have moved for summary judgment on five of the claims and to dismiss the remaining…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Larry Marshak v. "Doc" Green, John Doe "1", John Doe "2", Bernard Jones, David Rick, and Sandy Wolfe, David RickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,146 David Colan v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc., Eaton Corporation, and Koppers Company, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Johanna Farms, Inc. v. Citrus Bowl, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1978
- Doyle v. ShlenskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- International Armor & Limousine Company v. Moloney Coachbuilders, Inc., Third-Party v. Earle F. Moloney, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Int'l Armor & Limo v. Moloney CoachbuilderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Pereyra v. SedkyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015