Legal Opinion

In re Varner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1957No. 35095Published

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, J.

Because of our reasons for this decision, it is not necessary to decide some of the questions raised by the parties. For example, it is not necessary to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in dismissing the action as against the Pardon and Parole Commission. We will assume, without deciding, that petitioner is correct in his contention that, since the petitioner was being held in Summit County by the sheriff of Summit County who was served in that county, the Court of Appeals for *342Summit County did secure personal jurisdiction over the cm mission by service on it outside Summit…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Ughbanks v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  5. McCoy v. HarrisUtah Supreme Court · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API