Legal Opinion

Rossman v. Bock

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Gogebic. (Haire, j.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated'in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

In an action' of assumpsit appealed by defendant from justice’s court, the plaintiff filed a bill of particulars in the circuit court as follows, viz.:

“State oe Michigan,
“The Circuit Court for Gogebic County.
“John Rossman vs. Charles Bock.
“Plaintiff’s Bill of Particulars.
“To balance due for meat, vegetables, eggs, butter, and apples furnished at his request, delivered to M. A. Calkins, an itemized statement of which was presented to the defendant each month, from November, 1888-, to April, 1889, a portion remaining unpaid each month, the balance remaining unpaid being $56.
“An itemized bill of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Churchill v. MaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Mutual Electric & MacHine Co. v. Turner Engineering Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Stocklen v. BarrettOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Young v. HilsendegenMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API