Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Shelter Insurance Co. v. Woolems

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 2001No. 53A01-0101-CV-28Published

1ConcurrenceMattingly-May, J.

Our decision correctly found that Shelter's policy language is not ambiguous, and that Shelter is entitled to set-off its payments under the medical payments portion of the policy from any amounts due and owing Woolems under the underinsurance portion of the policy. Shelter's policy provided for $50,000.00 of underinsurance coverage. When Woolems received the $25,000.00 from Atlanta Casualty, the amount available to her under the Shelter policy was reduced to $25,000.00. As Shelter had already paid Woolems $25,000.00 under the medical payments portion of its policy, the amount then available…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meridian Mutual Insurance Co. v. RichieIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Standard Mutual Ins. Co. v. PleasantsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Wittig v. United Services Automobile AssociationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1969
  4. Johnson v. AAA Chicago Motor Club InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Beam v. Wausau Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API