Legal Opinion
Kulp v. Zeman (In re Kulp)
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 27, 1991No. 90-1190PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants (debtors) Lawrence and Debra Kulp filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy protection. Defendants-appellees, a creditor and the bankruptcy trustee, objected to debtors’ Chapter 13 plan, contending that it inappropriately exempted the entire balance of debtors’ individual retirement accounts (IRA’s) from the bankruptcy estate. The bankruptcy court agreed with the defendants and refused to confirm the plan. Debtors appeal from the district court judgment which affirmed the bankruptcy court order. We reverse the judgment and remand to the district court for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Hanover National Bank v. MoysesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- In Re Michael Duane Mullet, Debtor. First Bank of Colorado Springs, a State Banking Corporation v. Michael Duane MulletCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Sturges v. CrowninshieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- In Re MataUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Ginger Lea Marcus, Debtor. Ginger Lea Marcus v. Sally J. Zeman, Chapter 13 Trustee M. Stephen Peters, Chapter 7 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Richardson v. Schafer (In Re Schafer)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Dionne v. Harless (In Re Harless)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
- In Re MorrellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2008
- In re McFarlandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.