Legal Opinion

Van Boskerck v. Hayward

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to compel the plaintiff to pay the fees and disbursements of a referee.

1Opinion of the CourtGtegerich, J.

The referee appointed to sell in an action to foreclose a mortgage moves for an order-directing the plaintiff to pay the referee’s fees and disbursements. The referee was appointed to sell the property embraced in this action by a judgment entered on August 2, 1912. On August 6, 1912, publication of the notice of sale to be made on August twenty-ninth was begun. The notice of sale was sent to the papers through an advertising agency by one of the counsel for the plaintiff, but not the counsel who argues this motion. On August tenth the referee sent a letter to the Law Journal stating that he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harrington v. BaylesAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edbro Realty Co. v. ClareyNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Central Trust Co. v. Alcon Developers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API