Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Harry's Village, Inc. v. Egg Harbor Township

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 7, 1982Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPashman, J.

I concur in the majority opinion of Justice Pollock except insofar as it applies the second rent increase retroactively. To this extent, the Court has misapplied the law governing the relations of landlords and tenants in New Jersey. Moreover, the Court presents no justification for this result. On this narrow issue, I therefore dissent.

The majority properly concludes that when a rent control board or a court grants a rent increase pursuant to a rent control ordinance, the rent increase may not take effect until the landlord has given the tenants a valid notice to quit and notice of the rent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stamboulos v. McKeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  2. SKYLINE GARDENS, INC. v. McGarryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Bhar Realty Corp. v. BeckerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API