Legal Opinion · Dissent

Little Beverage Co., Inc. v. DePrez

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 2002No. 49A02-0203-CV-232Published

1DissentKirsch, J.

I respectfully dissent.

I believe that the resolution of this case turns on the meaning of “control” as used in the statutes regulating the sale and distribution of alcoholic beverages in Indiana. IC 7.1-5-9-2 prohibits a brewer from holding, acquiring, possessing, owning, controlling, or having an interest, claim, or title, in or to an establishment, company, or corporation holding or applying for a beer wholesaler’s permit. (Emphasis added.) When interpreting words of a single section of a statute, the court must construe them with due regard for all other sections of the act and with regard…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Central Beverage Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Miller Brewing Co. v. Bartholemew County Beverage Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Barco Beverage Corp. v. Indiana Alcoholic Beverage Comm.Indiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Campbell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Best Ever CompaniesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API