Legal Opinion

Jones v. Chandler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1872PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from the Vanderburg Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPettit, C. J.

This case depends upon the construction to be given to the following clause in the will of Michael P, *589Jones: “7. To my son,-Algernon R. Jones, his wife, and his heirs, seven-thirtieths (7-30) of all my estate.” Does this clause create a fee absolute in Jones and his wife by entirety ? If so, the judgment must be reversed; but if it creates, as is earnestly contended by the counsel of appellee, a fee simple absolute in Jones, and only a life estate in his wife, then the judgment must be affirmed.

By 1 G. & H. 259, sec. 7, “all conveyances and devises of lands, or of any interest therein, made…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chandler v. CheneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Jackson ex dem. Suffern v. McConnellNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  3. Barber v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  4. Davis v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Shaw v. HearseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sharpe v. BakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Dyer v. EldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Dodge v. KinzyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Thornburg v. WigginsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Roulston v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API