Legal Opinion

Carter v. LaMance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 14, 1930No. 19843PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

The petition, in so far as it relates to the city, shows that there is a misjoinder of parties as well as a misjoinder of causes of action, and that the case clearly falls under section 5515 of the Civil Code (1910). Citing several cases to support the proposi*697tion, Justice Atkinson, in Ansley v. Davis, 140 Ga. 615 (79 S. E. 454), said: “The case clearly falls within the principle of the Civil Code, § 5515, which prevents the joining in one action of distinct and separate claims against different persons.” No breach of a common duty on the part of both…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. BeaversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Twist v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. Ferguson v. Columbus & Rome RailwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  4. Ferguson v. Columbus & Rome RailwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  5. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CorbettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. O'NealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Gregory v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Gregory v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Gregory v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Laster v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API