Legal Opinion
State v. Sherbacow
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 15, 1990No. 7097PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a court trial, for the sale of cocaine by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b).1 The defendant claims that the court erred (1) in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal, (2) in denying his motion for a new trial, (3) in failing to give him the benefit of an adverse inference, (4) in failing to find a violation of the court’s sequestration order, and (5) in failing to perform an in camera review of claimed exculpatory material, and consequently denying his motion for sanctions.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- State v. JanuszewskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pollio v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- In re Jason R.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. RoblesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. LashConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- State v. SherbacowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.