Weppler v. Stansbury

OPINION

HOFFMAN, Judge.

Appellant Kenneth Weppler appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for relief from a judgment baséd upon Ind.Trial Rule 60(B)(8). Weppler’s sole contention is that the trial court abused its- discretion in failing .to grant the motion. The facts relevant to review are recited below.

In a memorandum decision issued October 22, 1996, this Court affirmed a judgment in favor of Dennis Stansbury finding Weppler liable for a loan by Stansbury in the amount of $15,000. 1 The underlying facts disclose that the loan originated when John Ash, who along with Stansbury…