Legal Opinion

Ida Ninio v. Donald W. Hight

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 27, 1967No. 9360PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Ninio appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict in her negligence action against defendant-appellee Hight for damages arising out of a skiing accident. The contention is, and must be, that only an inference of negligence can be drawn from the facts of the case and that the trial court erroneously refused to direct a verdict accordingly. And see Gushurst v. Benham, Colo., 417 P.2d 777; Christopherson v. Humphrey, 10 Cir., 366 F.2d 323. Alternatively, she insists that if the facts make out a case for the jury, the court erroneously refused to instruct…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Elizabeth Margaret Dallison and Max Dallison v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  2. Helen Yaich Christopherson v. Kathalene Tibbels HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  3. Clibon v. WaymanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  4. Behr v. McCoySupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  5. Gushurst v. BenhamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bartak v. Bell-Galyardt & Wells, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. Pizza v. Wolf Creek Ski Development Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Algis K. Rimkus and Matilde Rimkus v. Northwest Colorado Ski CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  4. Novak v. VireneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Duke's GMC, Inc. v. ErskineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API