Legal Opinion
Conditioned Air & Refrigeration Co. v. Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Labor-Management Relations Trust
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 23, 1956No. 1517PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERTBERG, District Judge.
Plaintiffs seek an injunction against defendants to restrain and enjoin them from receiving or accepting any money or thing of value from plaintiffs contrary to the provisions of Section 302, Subsections (A) and (B) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, as amended. 29 U.S.C.A. Section 186.
Plaintiffs Conditioned Air and Refrigeration Co., Bell and Hughes, Inc., and Baird Sheet Metal Works are California corporations.
Plaintiffs Earl Griffith and John Dyer are co-partners, doing business as Griffith-Dyer.
All plaintiffs are engaged in businesses which come under…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. FainblattSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- National Labor Relations Board v. FainblattSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United Marine Division v. Essex Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- People v. CilentoNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Local No. 2 of the Operative Plasterers and Cement Masons International Association, Etc. v. Paramount Plastering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Moses v. AmmondDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Employing Plasterers' Association Of Chicago v. Journeymen Plasterers' Protective And Benevolent Society Of Chicago, Local No. 5Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Sanders v. BirthrightDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1959
- Mechanical Contractors Association Of Philadelphia, Inc. v. Local Union 420Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.