Graves v. Merrill
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Eaton from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Brill, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
Read the full summary
Appeal by defendant Eaton from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Brill, J., denying a motion for a new trial. Simonson v. Grant, 36 Minn. 439, 31 N. W. 861; Wheaton v. Wheeler, 27 Minn. 464, 8 N. W. 599; Allis v. Ware, 28 Minn. 166, 9 N. W. 666; Campion v. Whitney, 30 Minn. 177, 14 N. W. 806; Wager v. Brooks, 37 Minn. 392, 34 N. W. 745; Erickson v. Brandt, 53 Minn. 10, 55 N. W. 62; Bell v. Forrestal, 55 Minn. 431, 57 N. W. 55, 223; Tomlinson v. Simpson, 33 Minn. 443, 23 N. W. 864; Duluth v. Heney, 43 Minn. 155, 45 N. W. 7; National Inv. Co. v. Schickling, 56 Minn. 283, 57 N.…
1Opinion of the Court
PEB CUBIAM.
This is an appeal by the defendant Eaton from an order of the district court for the county of Bamsey denying his motion for a new trial. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and judgment ordered upon the findings of fact for the plaintiff against the defendants in the sum of $2,397.02. The findings of fact are supported by the evidence. The facts are these: July 13, 1893, the plaintiff enters into a written contract with the defendant Merrill, whereby the latter agrees to furnish all labor and materials and build a dwelling house for the plaintiff, according to certain…
2Cited by9 opinions
- George A. Hormel & Co. v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Milavetz v. ObergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- State v. McKaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Hileman & Gindt v. FausSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Texas Fidelity & Bonding Co. v. Rosenberg Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.