United States v. Courtney
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge:
The United States appeals from the district court’s grant of Cherie Marie Courtney’s motion to suppress statements she made to federal investigators. Relying on Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600, 124 S.Ct. 2601, 159 L.Ed.2d 643 (2004), and Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298, 105 S.Ct. 1285, 84 L.Ed.2d 222 (1985), Courtney asserted that the agents’ tactic of obtaining inculpatory statements was designed to bypass Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). For the following reasons, we reverse.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Cherie…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Tashiri Wayne WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- People v. LopezIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- United States v. Johnny Carter, Micheal BearamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. StrakerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Mara v. RillingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.