Legal Opinion

United States v. Courtney

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 30, 2006No. 05-30156PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge:

The United States appeals from the district court’s grant of Cherie Marie Courtney’s motion to suppress statements she made to federal investigators. Relying on Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600, 124 S.Ct. 2601, 159 L.Ed.2d 643 (2004), and Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298, 105 S.Ct. 1285, 84 L.Ed.2d 222 (1985), Courtney asserted that the agents’ tactic of obtaining inculpatory statements was designed to bypass Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). For the following reasons, we reverse.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Cherie…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. United States v. Tashiri Wayne WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. People v. LopezIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  3. United States v. Johnny Carter, Micheal BearamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. StrakerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  5. Mara v. RillingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API