Legal Opinion
In Re Marshall
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 27, 1997No. 19-30351PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT J. KRESSEL, Bankruptcy Judge.
This case came on for hearing on the trustee’s objection to the debtor’s claim of exemption. Clayton D. Halunen appeared for the debtor and Paul J. Sandelin, the trustee, appeared in propria persona.
This court has jurisdiction over the motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(1) and 1334, and Local Rule 201. This is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).
BACKGROUND
The debtor is a former employee of The Original Cookie Company. Over the course of his employment, the debtor contends that he was subjected to sexual harassment by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Medill v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- In Re EzakiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- In Re BabcockUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1984
- In Re CrawfordUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- In Re MarandaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re CiottaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1998
- King v. WebbDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
- In Re MarshallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- In Re MarshallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- In Re DobbinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.