Legal Opinion

In re Thorn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 23, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application on the report of official referee upon charges against the respondent, an attorney at law, presented by the Association of the Bar of the City of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, P. J.:

There were three charges presented against the respondent, on two of which the official referee has found him guilty. The *152respondent was an attorney at law and was also engaged in certain real estate transactions. His sister, a Mrs. Witte, owned certain real estate in New York of which the respondent had charge. One lot was improved, which was subject to a mortgage of $3,500. Mrs. Witte was pressed for money to pay charges for taxes and interest. The respondent had acted for one Gustav Sinn in procuring for Sinn a second mortgage on improved property in the city of New York.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Silver v. GoldnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API