Standard Fashion Co. v. Blake
Appellate Court of Illinois
Memorandum.— Assumpsit for work, labor, etc. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edward F. Dunne, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1893.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary
The appellee was a traveling salesman in the service of the appellant, and this action is for a balance that he claims to be due him.
The jury gave him a verdict of $65.51, and the court gave him a judgment for the dollars, without the cents, and added to the dollars fifteen other dollars.
This addition the appellee tries to justify under the act providing for attorney’s fees when mechanic, artisan, miner, laborer or servant sues for wages, approved June 1, 1889,' printed at the end of chapter 13 of statute by Hurd.
The appellant seems not to be aware (and if the appellee is he won’t tell) that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Epps v. EppsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885
- Kankakee & Seneca Railroad v. HoranAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
- Eppstein v. WebbAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
3Cited by3 opinions
- Buren v. Mercury Press, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1935
- Giddings v. McCumberAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
- Franco v. Kar Products, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982