Legal Opinion

Netupsky v. New York State Board of Regents

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1978PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

George L. Cobb, J.

This is a CPLR article 78 proceeding in the nature of prohibition wherein the petitioner seeks to prohibit the respondents from continuing the summary suspension proceedings instituted against him pursuant to the applicable rule of the respondent Board of Regents (8 NYCRR 17.11).

The petitioner is licensed to practice dentistry in this State and on or about July 3, 1978, he was notified that on July 19, 1978 a hearing would be had on an application for a summary suspension of his license upon the ground that he had been convicted of a crime in that he had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lodes v. Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Jerry v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Matter of Dr. Bloom Dentist, Inc. v. CruiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. O'Brien v. Commissioner of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Murphy v. Commissioner of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 150 RFT Varick Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. 150 RFT Varick Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. The Cloister East, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API