Legal Opinion

Hoovler v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1997No. 79A02-9705-CV-312PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge.

Appellants-plaintiffs, Charles A. Hoovler, Linda L. Okos, Martin Okos, Patricia Ann Palmer, Robert M. Stwalley, III, and Jeff Symmes, individually and as representatives for and on behalf of all other taxpayers similarly situated (collectively, “the taxpayers”), challenge the constitutionality of P.L. 44-1994, legislation that authorizes an increase in the economic development income tax in Indiana counties and cities falling within certain narrowly-defined population ranges.

We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

P.L. 44-1994 allows Indiana counties with a population…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Johnson v. St. Vincent Hospital, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Collins v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Dague v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Book v. State Office Building CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1958

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cohn v. StrawhornIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Bonney v. Indiana Finance AuthorityIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Cohn v. StrawhornIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API