Legal Opinion

Atkins v. Saul

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 19, 2021No. 0:20-cv-00074Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA _________________________________ A.S.A., Case No. 20-cv-74 (ECW) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. _________________________________ This matter is before the Court on Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Andrew Saul’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 22). Plaintiff A.S.A. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this case seeking judicial review of a final decision by Defendant denying his application for supplementary security income. For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Charles Richard Stone v. Rick Harry Anita Schlank Deborah Konieska Rhonda Heskin Amy Anderson Lori Parkos Jim LindCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  3. Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. Geneva Goff v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  5. Marcus Hensley v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API