Churchill Farms, Inc. v. Louisiana Tax Commission
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
Appellant has filed an application for rehearing in which it generally rear-gues factual questions and, in addition, relies on the dissenting opinion which would hold plaintiff has been deprived of its property without due process of law in violation of LSA-Const. Art. 1, §§ 2 and 6. This per curiam is written for the purpose of *602pointing out the constitutional question was not considered in the majority opinion because it was not an issue before this court.
The statute, specifically the second paragraph of LSA-R.S. 47:1998, clearly and unequivocally requires the…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Giamalva v. CooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- National Materials Co. v. GuestLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Constantin Refining Co. v. DaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- State Ex Rel. Chehardy v. New Orleans Parkway CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Texas Company v. CooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.