People v. Leung
California Court of Appeal
Christopher Blake, Peter A. Estern and Corinne W. Shulman, under appointments by the Court of Appeal, for Defendants and Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CAPACCIOLI, Acting P. J.
Defendants were convicted of robbery, attempted robbery and false imprisonment. Weapons and arming enhancements were found true. On appeal they argue that (1) the restriction on jury voir dire embodied in Code of Civil Procedure section 223 arbitrarily distinguishes between criminal and civil proceedings in violation of criminal litigants’ right to equal protection under the law, (2) a prearrest photographic identification procedure was unduly suggestive and it was prejudicial error to admit evidence of this photographic identification at trial, (3) there were…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re ResendizCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. CareySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. WeaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.