Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Fiorini Landscape, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 28, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Laro Maintenance Corporation appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Ain, J.), entered October 6, 1997, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and the cross claim insofar as asserted against it, and the defendant Fiorini Landscape, Inc., separately appeals from the same order.

Ordered that the appeal by the defendant Fiorini Landscape, Inc., is dismissed for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the rules of this Court {see, 22 NYCRR…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Palka v. Servicemaster Management Services Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. Dino & Artie's Automatic Transmission Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Forte v. Franklin General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Rome Realty Leasing Limited PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Mitchell v. Fiorini Landscape, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Brandes v. Inc. Village of LindenhurstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Murdocca v. DiGioiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Giraldo v. Twins Ambulette Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API