Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bankers Trust Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 11, 1975No. 89-67Published

1DissentKashiwa, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority for the reasons hereinafter stated.

26 U.S.O. § 1001(b) (1970) provides, as pertinent herein, that the “amount realized from the sale or other disposition of property shall be the sum of any money received plus the fair market value of the property (other than money) received.” [Emphasis supplied.] Under this basic section, the present case turns out to be a simple stock valuation case. There is no dispute in this case as to when income was to be reported so we are not concerned with the date on which all the events had occurred which would require…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Ullman v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  4. Helvering v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Jack Daniel Distillery, Lem Motlow, Prop., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API