Merchants' & Farmers' Bank v. Reel
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). It is earnestly insisted that the deed to the one-acre tract of land on which the store and dwelling of Conner was situated should be set aside as being made in fraud of creditors. It is pointed out that the first two items of the indebtedness claimed by Reel to be owed him by Conner were barred by the statute of limitations. These were items claimed to be owed for the balance of wages for 1921 and 1922. In this contention, counsel for plaintiff are correct. The record shows that each year’s contract was separate in itself; and there was no account of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stuart v. Elk Horn Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Prins v. American Trust CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Griffin v. Batterall Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1918