Legal Opinion

Siddall v. Hudson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 4, 1918No. 7505PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Grimes County; S. W. Dean, Judge. Suit for mandamus by B. M. Hudson against George E. Siddall. From judgment for plaintiff, respondent appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellee, plaintiff below, alleging that he was desirous of purchasing a certain tract or parcel of land known and designated as unsurveyed or scrap land, under article 5422, chapter 9, title 79, of the Revised Statutes of Texas of 1911, pages 1126-1147, presented his application for a survey of the land to the appellant, defendant below, who at the time was the county surveyor of Grimes county, Tex. The application was for a survey of unsurveyed land appropriated to the public free school fund under chapter 11 (1st called Sess. 26th Leg.) Act February 23, 1900, and described it as being…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Commissioner of the General Land Office v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Missouri v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Fowler v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Cooley v. GoldenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Benson v. MorrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Orange Grocery Co. v. LeverettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Siesta Properties, Inc. v. Hart, Circuit Court of the 12th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Sarasota County1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API