Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Broad Street National Bank
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 1, 1920PublishedCited by 9 opinions
On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, ■whose opinion is reported in 90 N. J. Eq. 78.
1Per curiam
We concur in the view expressed by the learned vice-chancellor in his opinion filed in this cause, that the case is indistinguishable in principle from Sullivan v. Maroney, 77 N. J. Eq. 565, and that that decision is therefore controlling.
The decree will be affirmed.
*332For. affirm cunee — The Chief-Justice, Sway.ze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Mtnturn, Kalisci-i, Black, White, HepPENHEniEB, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson — 14.
For reversal — None.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. PoliakoffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
- Prudential Insurance Co. v. MantzNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
- In Re DegnanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- Strohsahl v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSUR. SOC'Y. OF USNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Prudential Ins Co. v. DeyerbergNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.