Roundtree v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.
Appellants contest their convictions for possession of cocaine and drug paraphernalia, asserting .that because the arresting officers failed to comply with Florida’s “knock and announce” statute, their motion to suppress evidence should have been granted. We agree and reverse.
The motion to suppress alleged that appellants Smith and Roundtree were lessees of a motel room and appellant Aikens (and another woman not involved in this appeal) were their invited guests. After a phone call from the manager of the motel expressing concern about possible drug activity in the room due to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Benefield v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Sheff v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Sheff v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- State v. BellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996