Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Doyle

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 7, 1903PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Complaint — appeal. Before Judge Lumpkin. Fulton superior court. March 13, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtX.amar, J.

1. In a suit on an account, to which the plea of the statute of limitations has been filed, a letter from the defendant to the attorney of the plaintiff, stating, “It will be absolutely impossible for me to give you anything before after the 1st of June. I will send you check for something then. . . Hope to be able to clear your acct. quick,” is not sufficient to relieve the bar of the statute of limitations.

2. The written acknowledgment or new promise to pay must clearly and distinctly identify the particular account, note, demand, or chose in action to be renewed, and there must also be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martin v. MayerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  2. Cleveland Lumber Company v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1975
  3. Stanfield v. HurseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  4. Sinclair Refining Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Thompson v. Bank of BuckheadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API