Legal Opinion
State of Ariz. Ex Rel. Woods v. Nucor Corp.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 22, 1992No. CIV 91-1094 PHX RCBPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BROOMFIELD, District Judge.
Plaintiff State of Atizona (the “State”) and Nucor Corporation (“Nucor”) jointly move for entry of a settlement agreement between the State and Nucor. 1 In response to public notice of the proposed settlement, three-non-parties responded: Components Incorporated (“Components”), the Lenore U. Pincus Family Trust (the “Trust”), and Highland Products, Inc. (“Highland”). For various reasons, these three entities urged the court to either postpone or deny entry of the settlement agreement. At that time, Components also moved to intervene as a plaintiff in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. R.W. Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- City of New York v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- United States v. Hercules, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Carrols Development Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1978
3Cited by21 opinions
- Arizona v. Components Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2005
- Nucor Corp. v. Employers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- United States v. Union Elec. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1996
- State of Arizona, Grant Woods, the Arizona Attorney General, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Edward Z. Fox, Director v. Components Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Nucor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.