Legal Opinion

Singleton v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 15, 1923No. 14215PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blood worth:, J.

We will discuss the question dealt with in the 2d headnote only. One of the grounds of the motion for a new trial is in part as follows: “After all the evidence had been submitted and the jury had retired to their room to consider said ease, and a foreman of the jury trying said case had been selected, it was agreed by the jury that a majority vote should be taken and the verdict should be made on a majority vote of the said jury as to the guilt or innocence of the said defendant. A vote was then taken by the jury on the guilt or innocence of the defendant, and six jurors…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Smith v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  4. City of Columbus v. OgletreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Sizer & Co. v. Melton & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Smoky Mountain Stages Inc. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  3. Roesser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Knight v. CausbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  5. Knight v. CausbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API