Legal Opinion

United States v. James

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided August 20, 1980No. NCM 80 0567PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARDS, Judge:

Appellant assigns as error:

THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY NOT INFORMING APPELLANT OF HIS “CHOICE OF FORUM” RIGHTS UNTIL AFTER FINDING HIM GUILTY PURSUANT TO HIS PLEAS, THEREBY RENDERING THE PLEAS IMPROVIDENT. UNITED STATES V. *647CARE, 18 U.S.C.M.A. 535, 40 C.M.R. 247 (1969).

We disagree and affirm.

Appellant entered his plea and was advised of the rights that would be given up by such a plea. He was then found guilty after an explanation of the meaning and effect of his plea, advice on the elements of the offense, and a factual predicate was established. At this point in the trial the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. States v. MillerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
  3. United States v. CunninghamU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. FordU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API