Legal Opinion

Schlotfeldt v. Bull

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1900No. 3325PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Superior Court, Kittitas County. — -Hon. John B. Davidson, Judge.

1Per curiam

This was a suit to foreclose a mortgage executed by Walter A. Bull and wife to secure a promissory note executed by the husband in 1884. The issue *363seems to have been the plea of the statute of limitations. The superior court found that payments had been made upon the note at sufficient intervals to prevent the bar of the statute. At the hearing of the cause counsel for respondents appeared, — counsel for the appellants not appearing,- — and moved for an affirmance of the judgment. An inspection of the record discloses that no statement of facts was filed; and the errors assigned, consisting…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dibble v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API