Ashley Creek Phosphate Co. v. Norton
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge.
The issue we address is whether Ashley Creek Phosphate Company has standing to bring this action under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). Ashley Creek has no environmental stake in the phosphate mining project at issue, which is some 250 miles from the phosphate Ashley Creek controls. Indeed, its only interest is an economic one: if the project does not go forward, Ashley Creek speculates that it might become an alternate supplier of phosphate. Because it has shown neither an injury in fact nor an interest within the zone of interests protected by section…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Navajo Nation v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Ouachita Watch League v. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Weiss v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF SAG HARBORDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Sierra Club v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Nulankeyutmonen Nkihtaqmikon v. ImpsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.