People v. Roldan
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJulius Helfand, J.
Defendant, under indictment for murder in the first degree, moves for a bill of particulars as to four items. The Distinct Attorney has consented to furnish the particulars requested in Items 1 and 2. Item 3 asks “ Whether the District Attorney, upon the trial of the indictment herein, intends to present any admission, written or oral, alleged to have been made by the defendant, in evidence against him; and if so, whether the said admission, confession or statement was made by said defendant freely and voluntarily, without any influence, fear or physical coercion whatever.
In the affidavits in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- People v. Preston, New York County Courts1958
- People v. StokesNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1960
- Hughes v. County Court of Kings CountyNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. WargoNew York Supreme Court · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. Utley, New York County Courts1974
- People v. TorresNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. Christiano, New York County Courts1967
- People v. SpadaroPoughkeepsie City Court · 1966